Those Darned Romans


John

When I visit ruins, I get the feeling that when you have seen one, you have seen them all: pieces of columns, crumbling walls, broken stones and wounded faces. The eerie realization of civilizations gone. But when I entered the archeological site of Baalbek in Lebanon, about two hours from Beirut close to the Syrian border, I was blown away. How could those Romans carve such huge stones from a quarry about a small mile away and transport them over uneven terrain to this site to build their temples?  And lift them one by one upon each other to construct their towering columns? What equipment did they use? Even today’s big cranes would have trouble carrying that out with the perfection the Romans did. Just take a look:

FW V3.10FW V3.10

Temple of Jupiter

Nobody could give me a good answer and subsequent research only delivered theories. Romans used slaves as workers but they had remarkable engineers who operated giant wheels and lifting equipment (as can be seen from the holes in the stones that served as grips) to get their stones in place, but much remains a mystery. And much is still standing tall despite continuous

wars and even a heavy earthquake in 1795.

. FW V3.10

It is often said that the Roman Empire crumbled due to declining morals, corruption and infighting. As a political system perhaps. However, when you stare at this power and glamorous art, its civilization is still very much alive. It bloomed on through medieval times and produced the best builders, composers, painters and musicians, furniture  and car designers we enjoy today. I stood in awe of what they were able to achieve two thousand years ago and before. Sure, we have built cathedrals and temples, too and when you travel in India, Persians, Mongolians and Indians achieved similar miracles as well around the same time, without knowing that we were building, too. As a development economist assisting Middle-Eastern countries in the several millennia old Levant, you wonder where it all got stuck. Differing religions? Internal strife? Looking back rather than looking forward? Tribal differences? Too many invaders (Phoenicians, Persians, Romans) and whoever followed after that? It is not a matter of intelligence. Men and women are very smart and many are well-educated. Surrounded by the Roman might, I felt quite humble, unable to arrive at a judgement.

FW V3.10FW V3.10

Temple of Bacchus

FW V3.10

How would I lift those tons of stone two thousand years ago?

Back in the real world of Beirut, West and Middle-East are meshed together in a web of contrasting and conflicting spheres. I don’t think I will ever fully comprehend it, but you eat there very well from multiple cultural recipes that make your mouth water and forget all the unrest.

FW V3.10Beirut with the Mediterranean in the back.

Lebanon is a beautiful country held together by impenetrable differences and regional meddling and that seems to have been that way for thousands of years. I felt uneasy in Beirut and much more at ease in Amman.

8Comments

Add yours
  1. 1
    Ala Al-Kazzaz

    Dear John
    The same thoughts came across my mind in Baalbek. Then in a moment of awakening, I recalled the theory of Aliens still under debate for the Sumerians in Mesopotamia as well as in many other locations in South America.
    There are so many landmarks of the ancient civilizations that cannot be re-constructed now with all the available technological tools.

    • 2
      John Schwartz

      Dear Ala;

      Ana, another reader, made the following comment which I think is quite thoughtful: “awesome architecture
      sometimes I feel like we have improved our machines and tech,
      but have lost the ability to think simple.
      There must be a simple explanation to all of it,…

      they had the manpower and the mind, we have the manpower and mind,
      maybe it is the pace at which we need to achieve results that stresses out the simplicity factor…” I think they had the time, indeed, and time was not money then: labor was “free”.

  2. 3
    Anna

    awesome architecture
    sometimes I feel like we have improved our machines and tech,
    but have lost the ability to think simple.
    There must be a simple explanation to all of it,…

    they had the manpower and the mind, we have the manpower and mind,
    maybe it is the pace at which we need to achieve results that stresses out the simplicity factor…

    • 4
      John Schwartz

      Anna: you are so right: pace at which we need to achieve results: pace costs money now, in those days, they had “all the time” and time was not money then, labor was “free”.

      Thanks for commenting,
      John

      • 5
        Anna

        Labor was never free, John. The question is, for whom was the labor free.

        Was it free for the labourers? No! They paid in blood sweat and life toil.

        It is always a matter of perspective, both then and now !

        • 6
          john

          Hi Anna, thanks for reacting. Right you are, it wasn’t “free” for the labourers! But it was “free” for those who procured the works in terms of “cost”. That’s what I meant.

  3. 7
    Ray Ban Sunglasses Sale

    Ray Ban Sunglasses Sale

    I attempted emailing but I am not certain if it was sent, so I’ve left a comment just to say that I’ve given you a spot on the featured resource list on our internet site. Whilst a link back to our website could be great, it is not required as we thi…

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.